Those responsible for
collection development face constraints of time and money. Professional reviews
are often relied on by library professionals who need to be knowledgeable of the
newest popular titles. With the vast number of books published yearly, reviews
that are found in Publishers Weekly, Booklist, Kirkus and School Library
Journal, as well as other genre related publications, allow books that are
receiving greater attention to quickly rise to the surface. As library funds
are limited, library professionals must be assured that the books that will be
in the most demand are available to their patrons. If a book is widely reviewed
and popular, it will also be one that is on the radar of library patrons who
will be looking for it in some format. Ebook only books, lacking reviews, would
be difficult to purchase unless I was already familiar with the author, had
received a personal recommendation or a request from a patron.
If I were in charge of
collection development for the Adult Department in our library, I would
probably add The Billionaire’s First Christmas to the collection, although I do
not think the two personal reviews would be factors in my decision. I might choose a book to read based on an
Amazon recommendation, but I would not purchase the title for my library if based
only on this ‘amateur’ recommendation. I tend to rely on professional book
reviews. The review by the blogger, particularly, was lukewarm in its support. However,
since Romances, such as this, seem to be popular with many of our patrons, adding
the title to the collection would be justified.
However, this title, although belonging to the
romance genre, does not seem to be an example of romantic suspense by its description
or the comments made by both reviewers. It lacks the fast pacing necessary in a
suspense novel. The story is not told from the heroine’s point of view; a
necessary element in romantic suspense genre. An element of danger is also
missing from the plot. I would consider The
Billionaire’s First Christmas a romance novel.
I would definitely add Angela’s Ashes to the
collection, particularly since all of the reviews enthusiastically recommended
the book. Certain phrases, such as “
powerful, exquisitely written debut” “an extraordinary work in every way”(Kirkus),”almost
impossible to put down, may well become a classic” (Library Journal) would
compel me to purchase this book without reservation.
The fact that some
books receive a great deal of attention and others very little of course
affects collection development. A book that receives rave reviews and is
highlighted in more than one professional journal is more likely to be noticed and
subsequently added to the collection. Following this line of thought, a book
that remains ‘under the radar’ of most reviewers may also not be on the radar
of those ordering for a library.
I appreciate
publications that do not refrain from including negative review, if it is
widely known that a publication, such as Booklist, does not publish negative
reviews it should have little bearing on purchasing decisions. Since I rely
heavily on reviews, as I suspect most who are involved in collection development
do, I appreciate reviews such as those found in Kirkus or School Library
Journal which provide an honest assessment. I also just really enjoy Kirkus reviews. They are
so well written and fun to read. I imagine those writing for Kirkus also enjoy
their work!
Great observations!
ReplyDeleteI also think reading profressional reviews are very important to collection development, but if a novel is popular among the public, but not the critics, it still should be just as considered as an addition to a library's collection just as much as any title recommended from a professional publication.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete